Old Rule, New Theory: Revising the Personal Benefit Requirement for Tipper/Tippee Liability Under the Misappropriation Theory of Insider Trading
David T. Cohen
Boston College Law Review
Boston College Law Review, Vol. 47, p. 547, 2006
Under the classical theory of insider trading, tipper/tippee liability may arise only when the tipper makes the relevant disclosure to obtain a personal benefit. Courts are divided, however, as to whether this personal benefit requirement applies to the misappropriation theory of insider trading. This Note argues that because the personal benefit requirement is severely flawed, courts should not impose it in misappropriation cases. Instead, courts adjudicating misappropriation cases should require that (1) the tipper was at least reckless as to whether he or she would either benefit personally or harm the information source by tipping, and (2) the tipper was at least reckless as to whether someone in the line of tippees would use the information to trade. This standard should be subject only to the tipper's defense that the disclosure was made in a good faith attempt to prevent criminal activity reasonably certain to cause substantial physical or financial harm to others.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 34
Keywords: Personal, benefit, tipper, tippee, misappropriation, insider, trading, trade, O'Hagan, Dirks, Chiarella, classical, theoryAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: April 27, 2006
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.375 seconds