|
||||
|
||||
Why Resource-Poor Dictators Allow Freer Media: A Theory and Evidence from Panel Data
Georgy Egorov Northwestern University - Kellogg School of Management Sergei M. Guriev New Economic School; Center for Economic and Financial Research (CEFIR); Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR) Konstantin Sonin New Economic School; Northwestern University - Kellogg School of Management; Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR) American Political Science Review, Forthcoming Abstract: Every dictator dislikes free media. Yet, many non-democratic countries have partially free or almost free media. In this paper, we develop a theory of media freedom in dictatorships and provide systematic statistical evidence in support of this theory. In our model, free media allow a dictator to provide incentives to bureaucrats and therefore to improve the quality of government. The importance of this benefit varies with the natural-resource endowment. In resource-rich countries, bureaucratic incentives are less important for the dictator; hence, media freedom is less likely to emerge. Using panel data, we show that controlling for country fixed effects, media are less free in oil-rich economies, with the effect especially pronounced in non-democratic regimes. These results are robust to model specification and the inclusion of various controls, including economic development, democracy, country size, size of government, and others.
Keywords: media freedom, non-democratic politics, bureaucracy, resource curse JEL Classifications: P16, D72, D80, Q4 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: April 30, 2006 ; Last revised: October 15, 2009Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo2 in 0.125 seconds.