Footnotes (436)



'Dear Sister Antillico . . .': The Story of Kirksey v. Kirksey

William R. Casto

Texas Tech University - School of Law

Val D. Ricks

South Texas College of Law

Georgetown Law Journal, Vol. 94, pp. 321-397, 2006

Kirksey v. Kirksey (Ala. 1845) is one of the most famous cases in American contract law. The simple, six-line opinion held, over a dissent, that only a promise of a conditional gift occurred, and was unenforceable. Yet the case is a puzzle.

First, its facts raise more questions than they answer. Countless Contracts teachers ask - Why did Isaac Kirksey invite his sister-in-law "Antillico" (an aberrant spelling of Angelico, we discovered) down to Talladega? Was he actually bargaining for something? How many children did Angelico bring? Did Isaac mean for the children to work on his plantation (did he bargain for their labor)? Did Isaac and Angelico have an affair (was the consideration meretricious)? Why did Isaac move to evict his sister-in-law? Was she unbearable as a neighbor? Why did she sue? What result was she seeking? What evidence was presented at trial? Did she have evidence of consideration other than her trip to Talladega? Was her lawyer incompetent? Did the law of the time support Angelico's legal position, or is the opinion's conclusion based on something other than legal authority? Did the appellate court usurp the jury's factfinding role? Why did the dissenting judge write the majority opinion? Whatever happened to Angelico and her small children? These questions serve pedagogy. Our informal poll of contract law teachers revealed a long list of objectives for which professors use Kirksey. Kirksey's ambiguities leave the professor free to take the case where she will.

Second, Kirksey is so ordinary - why is it taught at all? It announces no new doctrine. It explains no doctrine. It's author's style is not impressive, and his reputation is obscure. Today courts might reach the opposite result. Few courts have cited Kirksey, and none since 1949.

We resolve these puzzles. First, we answer all the questions raised by the facts. We were surprised by the answers and suggest that no one who has taught the case has had any idea what actually happened. Second, we explain how Kirksey gained fame. Briefly, Williston changed his mind about the case ("right" to "wrong"), and in the process talked about Kirksey so much that it became embedded in his teaching, his treatise, his mind, and his students' minds - until the case became one of contract law teaching's primary sources. Ironically, Williston's change of mind, the reason for the case's rise to fame (the second puzzle), was made possible by the case's ambiguity (the first).

Number of Pages in PDF File: 77

Keywords: Contracts, Legal History

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: May 1, 2006  

Suggested Citation

Casto, William R. and Ricks, Val D., 'Dear Sister Antillico . . .': The Story of Kirksey v. Kirksey. Georgetown Law Journal, Vol. 94, pp. 321-397, 2006. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=899002

Contact Information

William R. Casto
Texas Tech University - School of Law ( email )
1802 Hartford
Lubbock, TX 79409
United States
Val D. Ricks (Contact Author)
South Texas College of Law ( email )
1303 San Jacinto Street
Houston, TX 77002
713-646-2944 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 4,989
Downloads: 805
Download Rank: 19,420
Footnotes:  436

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.265 seconds