|
||||
|
||||
Sarbanes-Oxley: Legislating in Haste, Repenting in LeisureStephen M. BainbridgeUniversity of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - School of Law 2006 UCLA School of Law, Law-Econ Research Paper No. 06-14 Abstract: This essay was prepared for presentation as a lecture to the Hoover Institution. In it, I focus on three areas in which the Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act, popularly known as the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX), has proven especially problematic. First, the legal ethics rules added to the Act at the last minute have proven incapable of dealing with the incentives that condition lawyers to turn a blind eye to client misconduct. Second, the structure Congress chose for the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB), the accounting oversight board created by SOX, turns out to have serious constitutional defects. Finally, and most importantly, corporate compliance costs have gone up far more than anyone anticipated and are staying up far longer than even Cassandra might have predicted. Worse yet, these costs disproportionately impact smaller public corporations, which are an important engine of economic growth. Taken together, these three areas of concern highlight why Congress should think twice before trying instant legislation in the future.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 16 Keywords: Sarbanes-Oxley, corporate governance, securities regulation JEL Classification: K22 working papers seriesDate posted: May 1, 2006Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.328 seconds