A Unifying Theory of Contract Damages
David W. Barnes
Seton Hall University - School of Law
CUNY School of Law
Syracuse Law Review, Vol. 55, p. 495, 2005
Seton Hall Public Law Research Paper No. 899774
This article justifies a reformulation of modern contract damage rules articulated in a new restatement of contract damages, see Barnes and Zalesne, The Shadow Code, 56 SOUTH CAROLINA L. REV. 93 (2004). The unifying principles of the surplus-based approach offered here lies in the shadows of contract remedies as articulated in Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code (U.C.C.), the Restatement (Second) of Contracts. The Shadow Code presented in this Article combines these principles and formulas into a new image of legal remedies for contract breach. This reconceptualization is based on the foundational principle that parties injured by contract breach are entitled to any surplus of benefits over costs those parties would have realized had the breaching parties performed. The Shadow Code reflects the modern understanding that damages are intended to ensure that the injured party is as well off as if the other party had performed as promised.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 49
Keywords: contract law, remedies, contract damages, Uniform Commercial code, Restatement of Contracts, contract breachAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: May 1, 2006
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.266 seconds