Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=900021
 
 

Footnotes (124)



 


 



Of Fine Lines, Blunt Instruments, and Half-Truths: Business Acquisition Agreements and the Right to Lie


Jeffrey M. Lipshaw


Suffolk University Law School

September 8, 2006

Tulane Public Law Research Paper No. 06-0000

Abstract:     
In this article, I expand upon a happy coincidence (for scholars) in reconciling the overlap between contract and fraud. Both the recent book by Ian Ayres and Gregory Klass and the Delaware Court of Chancery in Abry Partners Acquisition V, L.P. v. F& W Acquisition, LLC addressed the issue of promissory fraud - the making of a contract as to which the promisor had no intention of performing. Each treatment, however, in focusing on fraudulent affirmative representations, falls short of (a) recognizing the fundamental aspect of deceptive promising in a complex deal, namely the half-truth, (b) articulating an appropriate doctrinal principle to address it, or (c) capturing the social and linguistic context that makes the deceptive half-truth so insidious.

The archetypal facts in Abry frame the issue. When the parties to a business acquisition agreement purport to limit the buyer's reliance to those representations and warranties set forth in the agreement, just what obligations of truth-telling have the parties contractually released? We need to grapple with the inter-relationship of law, language, mutual understanding, and trust. The language of the law (and the contract) is a blunt instrument by which to map to track the subtle fine lines of a complex agreement. I will contend that there is a kind of special arrogance in the illusion onto which lawyers hold - that the uncertainties and contingencies of the world are in their power to be controlled, and to the winner of the battle of words go the spoils. The correct doctrinal result is to presume in the transactional speech acts (including the contract), as we do in everyday life, a default of truth-telling, to permit the parties freely to contract around the rule, but to require narrow construction of the exceptions and disclaimers.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 58

Keywords: contract, fraud, misrepresentation, mergers and acquisitions, warranties, disclaimers, reliance

JEL Classification: K13, K20, K23

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: May 2, 2006  

Suggested Citation

Lipshaw, Jeffrey M., Of Fine Lines, Blunt Instruments, and Half-Truths: Business Acquisition Agreements and the Right to Lie (September 8, 2006). Tulane Public Law Research Paper No. 06-0000. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=900021 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.900021

Contact Information

Jeffrey M. Lipshaw (Contact Author)
Suffolk University Law School ( email )
120 Tremont Street
Boston, MA 02108-4977
United States
HOME PAGE: http://ssrn.com/author=381790

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,096
Downloads: 253
Download Rank: 34,297
Footnotes:  124

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.938 seconds