Tweaking Booker: Advisory Guidelines in the Federal System
Douglas A. Berman
Ohio State University (OSU) - Michael E. Moritz College of Law
Houston Law Review, Vol. 43, 2006
Ohio State Public Law Working Paper No. 67
If writing on a blank slate, few would likely advocate the precise sentencing system resulting from the Supreme Court's decision in Booker. Nevertheless, in this Article, I contend that policymakers should consider playing the peculiar Booker hand that the Court has dealt for federal sentencing. Especially because any significant alteration of the structure of federal sentencing remains legally treacherous and fraught with uncertainty, Congress and the U.S. Sentencing Commission should focus their efforts and energies on improving the advisory guideline system that Booker has produced. I suggest that, though the sentencing scheme created by Booker is far from perfect, a program of modulated incremental changes is likely to provide the soundest course for the post-Booker development of the federal sentencing system.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 51
Keywords: sentence, penal, imprisonment
JEL Classification: K41, K42Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: May 5, 2006
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.406 seconds