Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=901026
 
 

Footnotes (377)



 


 



Filburn's Legacy


James Ming Chen


Michigan State University - College of Law


Emory Law Journal, Vol. 52, p. 1719, 2003
Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 06-24

Abstract:     
Wickard v. Filburn, 317 U.S. 111 (1942), represented a pivotal moment in the Supreme Court's effort to determine the scope of Congress's power "[t]o regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes." Together with NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp., 301 U.S. 1 (1937), and United States v. Darby, 312 U.S. 100 (1941), Filburn is widely thought to have marked a turning point in commerce clause jurisprudence. Under Chief Justice William Rehnquist, the Supreme Court severely undermined what had been regarded as the post-New Deal consensus on the scope of Congress's commerce power. This reconsideration of commerce clause doctrine warrants careful reexamination of Wickard v. Filburn.

This article tells the story of Wickard v. Filburn. After providing a brief survey of American agriculture and its regulation between the World Wars, this article describes the specific controversy over Roscoe Filburn's 1941 wheat crop. In its own time, Wickard v. Filburn represented merely one component of the New Deal Court's commerce clause jurisprudence. Greater turmoil over the commerce clause at the turn of the twenty-first century has breathed new life into Filburn. This article therefore examines not only what Filburn meant at the time of its decision, but also what it represents in our time.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 51

Keywords: Filburn, Wickard, agriculture, New Deal, Great Depression, Agricultural Adjustment Act, USDA, AAA, commerce clause, interstate commerce, aggregation, wheat, price support, supply control, family farms

JEL Classification: D41, K23, O13, Q12, Q18

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: May 8, 2006  

Suggested Citation

Chen, James Ming, Filburn's Legacy. Emory Law Journal, Vol. 52, p. 1719, 2003; Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 06-24. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=901026

Contact Information

James Ming Chen (Contact Author)
Michigan State University - College of Law ( email )
318 Law College Building
East Lansing, MI 48824-1300
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 6,935
Downloads: 1,162
Download Rank: 8,692
Footnotes:  377

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.375 seconds