Citations (1)


Footnotes (172)



Should We Redistribute in Insolvency?

John Armour

University of Oxford - Faculty of Law; University of Oxford - Said Business School; European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI)

March 2006

The characterisation of a security interest as 'fixed' or 'floating' has generated much litigation in English courts. This is because a floating charge is subordinated by statute to other claims in the debtor's insolvency, whereas a fixed charge is not. This paper uses the example of the floating charge to argue that such statutory redistribution between claimants in corporate insolvency is generally undesirable. If particular types of voluntary transaction are subjected to statutory 'taxation', then parties may be expected to structure their affairs so as to avoid the ambit of the legislation. The paper traces the history of the floating charge, showing how both its use by business, and the litigation that has shaped its juridical 'nature', have been driven by the desire to avoid redistribution in insolvency. This has resulted in relatively little money reaching the intended beneficiaries of the statutory redistribution. It has also engendered significant costs: the direct costs of litigation and the opportunity costs of a constrained choice of financial structures.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 55

Keywords: Corporate insolvency, law and finance, history of floating charge, bankruptcy priorities, secured credit

JEL Classification: G32, G33, H23, K22, N43

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: May 15, 2006  

Suggested Citation

Armour, John, Should We Redistribute in Insolvency? (March 2006). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=901451 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.901451

Contact Information

John Armour (Contact Author)
University of Oxford - Faculty of Law ( email )
Oriel College
Oxford, OX1 4EW
United Kingdom
+44 1865 286544 (Phone)
University of Oxford - Said Business School ( email )
Park End Street
Oxford, OX1 1HP
Great Britain
European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI) ( email )
B-1050 Brussels
HOME PAGE: http://www.ecgi.org
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,573
Downloads: 687
Download Rank: 23,578
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  172

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.281 seconds