Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=902043
 
 

Citations (2)



 
 

Footnotes (346)



 


 



Assessing the New Judicial Minimalism


Christopher J. Peters


University of Baltimore - School of Law


Columbia Law Review, Vol. 100 p. 1454, 2000

Abstract:     
In this article, which has been published in slightly revised form at 100 Colum. L. Rev. 1454 (2000), I critique some recently prominent arguments for "judicial minimalism" in constitutional decisionmaking. Current minimalist arguments, I contend, are primarily "policentric," that is, focused on the role the judiciary can play in bolstering the accountability and deliberativeness of the political branches. Drawing in part on a previous article, I offer an alternative approach to minimalism that is "juricentric" - focused on the inherent democratic legitimacy of the adjudicative process and the unique competence of that process to produce decisions about individual rights. I argue that a juricentric approach supports what I call "procedural" minimalism: the presumptive practice of deciding constitutional cases in the "narrowest" and "shallowest" way possible. I also argue, however, that a juricentric approach undermines the case for "substantive" minimalism: the presumptive practice of deferring to the political branches in deciding the issues necessary to resolve constitutional cases.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 127

Keywords: judging, judges, judicial, minimalist, minimalism, supreme court, O'Connor, Sunstein, Bickel, judicial review, constitutional law, constitution

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: May 17, 2006  

Suggested Citation

Peters, Christopher J., Assessing the New Judicial Minimalism. Columbia Law Review, Vol. 100 p. 1454, 2000. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=902043

Contact Information

Christopher J. Peters (Contact Author)
University of Baltimore - School of Law ( email )
1420 N. Charles Street
Baltimore, MD 21201
United States
410-837-4509 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://law.ubalt.edu
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 648
Downloads: 77
Download Rank: 188,387
Citations:  2
Footnotes:  346

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.234 seconds