Devolution of Authority: The DOJ's Corporate Charging Policies
Lawrence D. Finder
affiliation not provided to SSRN
Ryan D. McConnell
Haynes and Boone LLP
St. Louis University Law Journal, Vol. 51, No. 1, 2006
This paper examines the Department of Justice's corporate charging policy through the lens of reported deferred and nonprosecution agreements entered into since 1991. The authors have collected and examined each agreement and present their findings, in part, through detailed tables which highlight the salient features of these agreements. The paper ties changes in these pre-trial agreements to the pre-trial diversion procedures in the U.S. Attorney's Manual and the implementation of the Organizational Guidelines within the Federal Sentencing Guidelines as well as various memorandums issued by the Department including the Holder Memorandum, the Thompson Memorandum, and the McCallum Memorandum. The article highlights how these agreements have changed over the past 15 years. By analyzing these agreements and explicit charging policies (the Organizational Guidelines, the various DOJ memorandums, and the U.S. Attorney's Manual), the article shows that DOJ corporate charging policy has devolved into an office by office policy and that the terms of a pre-trial agreement depend on which U.S. Attorney's Office is handling the investigation. The statistics and data in this paper are current as of August 21, 2006.
Keywords: Thompson Memo, Holder Memo, McCallum Memo, Deferred, Prosecution, Nonprosecution, U.S. Attorney, Sentencing Guidelines, Enron, Andersen, KPMG, Boeing, DPA, NPA, Corporate, White CollarAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: June 12, 2006
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.297 seconds