Abstract

 
 

References (10)



 
 

Citations (1)



 


 



Intellectual Capital Reporting: A User Perspective


Suresh Cuganesan


Swinburne University of Technology

Richard Petty


Macquarie University

Nigel Finch


The University of Sydney Business School

2005


Abstract:     
The field of intellectual capital (IC) has witnessed rapid growth in recent times, with a range of IC measurement and reporting models being developed by academics, consultants and practitioners. Despite widespread pronouncements that businesses report their IC, and increasingly regulatory requirements for organisations to do so, surveys of practice indicate limited IC reporting practice. In addition, there are limited empirically-validated insights in to the reasons for this apparent 'disconnect' between theory and practice, with important questions remaining unresolved: do users of corporate disclosure information find this adequate? Is there demand for IC reporting? If so, how is this best provided? Given these questions, this study examines the need of decision makers for IC information.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 5

Keywords: Intellectual capital, corporate disclosure, voluntary disclosure

JEL Classification: G30, M41, M44, M45

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: May 15, 2006  

Suggested Citation

Cuganesan, Suresh, Petty, Richard and Finch, Nigel, Intellectual Capital Reporting: A User Perspective (2005). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=902204 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.902204

Contact Information

Suresh Cuganesan
Swinburne University of Technology ( email )
Cnr Wakefield and William Streets, Hawthorn Victor
3122 Victoria, Victoria 3122
Australia
+61 3 9214 8388 (Phone)
+61 3 9819 2117 (Fax)
Richard Petty (Contact Author)
Macquarie University ( email )
North Ryde
Sydney, New South Wales 2109
Australia
Nigel Finch
The University of Sydney Business School ( email )
Sydney
Australia
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 3,064
Downloads: 999
Download Rank: 9,271
References:  10
Citations:  1

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.515 seconds