Jefferson Rebuffed - The United States and the Future of Internet Governance
Oxford Internet Institute; Harvard University - Harvard Kennedy School (HKS)
New York University (NYU) - Department of Media, Culture, and Communication
KSG Working Paper No. RWP06-018
Over the last several years, many have called for an internationalization of Internet governance in general, and Internet naming and numbering in particular. The multi-year WSIS process that culminated in November 2005 was intended to create momentum in such direction. The United States has long resisted such internationalization, fearing in particular the growing influence of China and similar nations. In September 2005 the European Union put forward a proposal which would have offered a constitutional moment for Internet governance by suggesting internationalization based on fundamental values of the Internet community. The swift rejection of the proposal by the US was surprising, both from a tactical as well as - in light of its own constitutional history - a substantive viewpoint. In this article we describe the main features of the European proposal and what it might have created. We evaluate four possible arguments explaining US rejection: delegation of power, objective rights, public choice, and de-legitimization of international regimes.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 41
Keywords: Information Technology, Intergovernmental Relations, International Affairs/Globalization, Law and Legal Institutions, Science¸ Technology and Public Policyworking papers series
Date posted: July 6, 2006
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.547 seconds