Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=902673
 
 

Footnotes (69)



 


 



Fundamentally Wrong About Fundamental Rights


Adam Winkler


University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - School of Law


Constitutional Commentary, 2006
UCLA School of Law Research Paper No. 06-26

Abstract:     
This short essay argues that the traditional and often repeated notion that laws burdening fundamental rights receive strict scrutiny is wrong. Many fundamental rights are not protected by strict scrutiny but by lesser standards or by categorical rules. Even rights, such as speech, free exercise of religion, and privacy, which do trigger strict scrutiny only do so occasionally; in many speech, religion, and privacy cases, the courts require the government to meet far less burdensome standards. In short, fundamental rights are governed by strict scrutiny only some of the time.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 12

Keywords: fundamental rights, strict scrutiny

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: May 17, 2006  

Suggested Citation

Winkler, Adam, Fundamentally Wrong About Fundamental Rights. Constitutional Commentary, 2006; UCLA School of Law Research Paper No. 06-26. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=902673

Contact Information

Adam Winkler (Contact Author)
University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - School of Law ( email )
385 Charles E. Young Dr. East
Room 1242
Los Angeles, CA 90095-1476
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,913
Downloads: 322
Download Rank: 51,729
Footnotes:  69

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.375 seconds