Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=904317
 
 

Footnotes (218)



 


 



The First Amendment and Measuring Media Diversity: Constitutional Principles and Regulatory Challenges


Adam Candeub


Michigan State University College of Law


Northern Kentucky Law Review, Vol. 33
MSU Legal Studies Research Paper No. 03-26

Abstract:     
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) limits the number of media outlets one entity can control in either national or local media markets and has restricted one entity from owning several outlets in different types of media. The FCC has justified its regulations as necessary to promote diversity of viewpoint. While the Supreme Court for decades has upheld these restrictions against First Amendment challenge, recent cases have been less receptive, using stricter scrutiny or demanding more empirical support.

The problems the FCC's regulations face in court, however, stem as well from the FCC's inability to rely on meaningful metrics for its putative regulatory goal, viewpoint diversity. Rather than attempt to quantify or identify the number of viewpoints and ideas in a given media market, the FCC asserts that diversity of ownership is a proxy for diversity of viewpoint. The FCC, therefore, counts heads to determine if there is enough diversity - a meaningless inquiry when not tethered to a measurement of diversity of media content.

This article proposes empirical and normative approaches to strengthen media ownership regulation. Empirically, the FCC could tackle the difficult question of relating viewpoint diversity in media content to market structure, a task its rulemaking has largely avoided. Normatively, in a de facto shift of the burden of persuasion, the FCC could argue from ethical/political grounds for decentralized ownership and maximize it until economic data clearly point to economic inefficiencies. In this way, a normative preference for decentralized ownership would guide regulatory action, and the FCC's line-drawing would concern economic efficiency - a more easily defined term than the elusive diversity concept.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 28

Keywords: First Amendment, media regulation, media diversity, Federal Communications Commission

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: May 25, 2006  

Suggested Citation

Candeub, Adam, The First Amendment and Measuring Media Diversity: Constitutional Principles and Regulatory Challenges. Northern Kentucky Law Review, Vol. 33; MSU Legal Studies Research Paper No. 03-26. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=904317

Contact Information

Adam Candeub (Contact Author)
Michigan State University College of Law ( email )
318 Law College Building
East Lansing, MI 48824-1300
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,033
Downloads: 136
Download Rank: 124,208
Footnotes:  218

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.266 seconds