Abstract

 
 

References (41)



 
 

Citations (1)



 


 



Islam and CSR: A Study of the Compatibility between the Tenets of Islam and the UN Global Compact


John Zinkin


Nottingham University Business School (NUBS)

Geoffrey Williams


Academy of Responsible Management

February 2006


Abstract:     
This paper looks at whether the tenets of Islam are consistent with the "Ten Principles" of responsible business outlined in the UN Global Compact. The paper concludes that with the possible exception of Islam's focus on personal responsibility and the non-recognition of the corporation as a legal person, which could undermine the concept of corporate responsibility, there is no divergence between the tenets of the religion and the principles of the UN Global Compact. Indeed Islam often goes further and has the advantage of clearer codification of ethical standards as well as a set of explicit enforcement mechanisms. Focusing on this convergence of values could be useful in the development of a new understanding of CSR in a global context and help avert the threatened "clash of civilizations".

Number of Pages in PDF File: 27

Keywords: CSR, Islam, UN Global Compact, Environment, Human Rights, Labour Rights

JEL Classification: M14, M21, Z1, M10, M20

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: May 31, 2006  

Suggested Citation

Zinkin, John and Williams, Geoffrey Alan, Islam and CSR: A Study of the Compatibility between the Tenets of Islam and the UN Global Compact (February 2006). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=905201 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.905201

Contact Information

John Zinkin
Nottingham University Business School (NUBS) ( email )
Jubilee Campus
Wollaton Road
Nottingham, NG8 1BB
United Kingdom
Geoffrey Alan Williams (Contact Author)
Academy of Responsible Management
Suite 2B-12-3, Block 2B, Plaza Sentra
2 Jalan Stesen Sentral 5
Kuala Lumpur, 50470
Malaysia
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,708
Downloads: 748
Download Rank: 14,517
References:  41
Citations:  1

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.703 seconds