Abstract

 


 



Redefining Miscarriages of Justice: A Revived Human-Rights Approach to Unearth Subjugated Discourses of Wrongful Criminal Conviction


Michael Naughton


University of Bristol - Faculty of Social Sciences and Law

March 2005

The British Journal of Criminology, Vol. 45, Issue 2, pp. 165-182, 2005

Abstract:     
This article confronts a question that has barely received any attention at all: What precisely constitutes a 'miscarriage of justice' in England and Wales? It revives two complimentary human-rights-based perspectives that have lain dormant for almost a decade and brings them into dialogue with Foucault's theoretical note on the need to unearth subjugated discourses that interrupt and disturb dominant ways of thinking. It redefines miscarriages of justice to include all successful appeals against criminal conviction, to provide a more adequate depiction of 'justice in error'. It emphasizes the need for future research on routine successful appeals, to unearth and give 'voice' to a plethora of 'anti-discourses' on wrongful criminal conviction that are not currently articulated.

Keywords: cancer, deaths, Europe, European Union, incidence

Accepted Paper Series


Date posted: February 29, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Naughton, Michael, Redefining Miscarriages of Justice: A Revived Human-Rights Approach to Unearth Subjugated Discourses of Wrongful Criminal Conviction (March 2005). The British Journal of Criminology, Vol. 45, Issue 2, pp. 165-182, 2005. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=905408 or http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azh066

Contact Information

Michael Naughton (Contact Author)
University of Bristol - Faculty of Social Sciences and Law ( email )
Bristol BS8 1TH,
United Kingdom
+44 0 117 954 5323 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 597

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.312 seconds