Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=905676
 
 

Citations



 


 



Public Opinion Versus Public Judgment About Crime: Correcting the 'Comedy of Errors'


David A. Green


University of Cambridge - Institute of Criminology

January 2006

The British Journal of Criminology, Vol. 46, Issue 1, pp. 131-154, 2006

Abstract:     
This paper builds a case for more defensible assessments of informed public opinion on crime control and penal policy. Mass-mediated portrayals of what the public want and ubiquitous self-selected opinion polls serve as common surrogates for informed public opinion. These highly suspect assessments have gained a level of credence in policy debates that is difficult to justify. Innovations like the Deliberative Poll show promise in facilitating what has been called 'public judgment'-a more reliable and refined state of informed public opinion. Less ambitious remedial proposals, including the public education programmes advocated by some experts and recently embraced by the Home Office, are insufficiently bold to make a significant and lasting impact on public knowledge and attitudes.

Keywords: advertising model, advertising wear out phenomenon, pulsation advertising policy, linear programming

Accepted Paper Series


Not Available For Download

Date posted: February 29, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Green, David A., Public Opinion Versus Public Judgment About Crime: Correcting the 'Comedy of Errors' (January 2006). The British Journal of Criminology, Vol. 46, Issue 1, pp. 131-154, 2006. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=905676 or http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azi050

Contact Information

David A. Green (Contact Author)
University of Cambridge - Institute of Criminology
7 West Road
Cambridge, England
United Kingdom
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,429

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 1.376 seconds