Public Opinion Versus Public Judgment About Crime: Correcting the 'Comedy of Errors'
David A. Green
University of Cambridge - Institute of Criminology
The British Journal of Criminology, Vol. 46, Issue 1, pp. 131-154, 2006
This paper builds a case for more defensible assessments of informed public opinion on crime control and penal policy. Mass-mediated portrayals of what the public want and ubiquitous self-selected opinion polls serve as common surrogates for informed public opinion. These highly suspect assessments have gained a level of credence in policy debates that is difficult to justify. Innovations like the Deliberative Poll show promise in facilitating what has been called 'public judgment'-a more reliable and refined state of informed public opinion. Less ambitious remedial proposals, including the public education programmes advocated by some experts and recently embraced by the Home Office, are insufficiently bold to make a significant and lasting impact on public knowledge and attitudes.
Keywords: advertising model, advertising wear out phenomenon, pulsation advertising policy, linear programmingAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: February 29, 2008
© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.422 seconds