Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=906597
 
 

Footnotes (99)



 


 



Using All Available Information


Max Huffman


Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law


Review of Litigation, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 501-528, 2006

Abstract:     
In this review essay published in the Review of Litigation (Univ. of Texas), I consider Justice Breyer's recent book Active Liberty: Interpreting our Democratic Constitution. Much of the review is a comparison and contrast with Justice Scalia's 1997 work, A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law. I consider Justice Breyer's purposes and consequences approach to interpretation and its application to the process of constitutional and statutory interpretation. I then analyze whether it, or Justice Scalia's texualism and originalism - together, in Justice Breyer's words, literalism - tend to be more amenable to consistent and principled application. I conclude that the two philosophies are not so far apart as they seem. Both can be criticized, if one is so inclined, as placing too great of faith in an unelected federal judiciary. The most attractive aspect of Justice Breyer's book, a call for using all available information in the interpretive exercise, unfortunately is subordinated. It remains to be seen whether Justice Breyer's new publication will help courts in reaching a consistently applicable interpretive philosophy that promises majority acceptance.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 28

Keywords: purpose, consequence, interpretation, construction, statute, statutory, constitution, constitutional, textualism, originalism, literalism, activism, courts, federal courts, judges, living constitution, active liberty, a matter of interpretation, breyer, scalia, supreme court

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: June 6, 2006  

Suggested Citation

Huffman, Max, Using All Available Information. Review of Litigation, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 501-528, 2006. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=906597

Contact Information

Max Huffman (Contact Author)
Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law ( email )
530 West New York Street
Indianapolis, IN 46202
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,160
Downloads: 126
Download Rank: 131,923
Footnotes:  99

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.250 seconds