The Invisible Pillar of Gideon
Adam M. Gershowitz
William & Mary Law School
Indiana Law Journal, Vol. 80, p. 571, 2005
In the four decades since Gideon v. Wainwright, the Supreme Court has decided dozens of cases that have defined the scope of indigent defendants' right to appointed counsel. Despite this rich history, the Court has never addressed the crucial question of what it actually means to be indigent. In other words, while it is now axiomatic that the poor are entitled to a free lawyer, there is virtually no authority specifying how poor a defendant must in fact be to qualify for appointed counsel.
In addition to hypothesizing why the Supreme Court has never defined indigency and reviewing the inadequate definitions adopted by many states, this article argues for a constitutional minimum definition of indigency to protect the integrity of Gideon. The article considers the different methods and institutions for adopting such a constitutional floor and advocates an indigency definition that is based upon the standards used in federal poverty entitlement programs.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 34
Keywords: indigence, indigent, appointed counsel, Gideon, constitutional floorAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: June 7, 2006 ; Last revised: May 29, 2014
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.250 seconds