Disruptive Technology or Visionary Leadership?
Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 34-38, January 2006
5 Pages Posted: 7 Jun 2006
Abstract
Christensen's (1997) thesis of disruptive technology has been highly praised and popular with managers. Two of its premises are important and insightful. These deal with the performance path of a disruptive technology and its impact on dominant incumbents who ignore it in favor of listening to their current consumers. However, Christensen's thesis also suffers from limitations, two of which are troubling: ambiguity in the definition of disruptive technology and the logic of the sampling to test its validity. Several studies I have conducted over the years suggest that the disruption of incumbents - if and when it occurs - is due not to technological innovation per se but rather to incumbents' lack of vision of the mass market and an unwillingness to cannibalize assets to serve that market. I have developed metrics to test these concepts, along with models to predict the outcomes and financial value of strategic changes firms can make to avoid these problems.
Keywords: Disruptive Technology, Innovation, Strategy
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
First to Market, First to Fail? Real Causes of Enduring Market Leadership
By Gerard J. Tellis and Peter N. Golder
-
Technological Evolution and Radical Innovation
By Ashish Sood and Gerard J. Tellis
-
Performing Hypothesis Tests on the Shape of Functional Data
By Gareth James and Ashish Sood
-
The S-Curve of Technological Evolution: Marketing Law or Self-Fulfilling Prophecy?
By Ashish Sood and Gerard J. Tellis
-
Endogenous R&D Symmetry in Linear Duopoly with One-Way Spillovers
-
The Curse of Innovation: A Theory of Why Innovative New Products Fail in the Marketplace
-
Commercialising Breakthrough Technologies: Scenarios and Strategies
By J Roland Ortt, Marc Zegveld, ...