Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=908369
 
 

Footnotes (212)



 


 



How Much is Too Much? An Examination of the Principle of Jus in Bello Proportionality


Hamutal Esther Shamash


affiliation not provided to SSRN


Israel Defense Forces Law Review, Vol. 2, 2005-2006

Abstract:     
The Principle of Proportionality, codified in Protocol I Additional to the Geneva Conventions, defines as disproportionate any attack in which the incidental damage to civilians is excessive in relation to the military advantage anticipated from the attack. However, it is close to impossible to pinpoint exactly what is meant by "excessive." This writer posits that this vagueness is not a coincidence, but rather a tool, serving the purposes of attacking states. It is argued that international legal discourse blurs this definition, and this is demonstrated with reference to NATO's operations in Kosovo. It is submitted that, despite this, it would be beneficial to define this requirement more clearly, and a way in which this could be accomplished is suggested.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 63

Keywords: International Law, Geneva additional protocol, target selection, targeting, proportionality, International humanitarian law

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: June 15, 2006  

Suggested Citation

Shamash, Hamutal Esther, How Much is Too Much? An Examination of the Principle of Jus in Bello Proportionality. Israel Defense Forces Law Review, Vol. 2, 2005-2006. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=908369

Contact Information

Hamutal Esther Shamash (Contact Author)
affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )
No Address Available
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,994
Downloads: 476
Download Rank: 32,690
Footnotes:  212

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.281 seconds