Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=908710
 
 

Footnotes (262)



 


 



Class Action Lawmaking: An Administrative Law Model


Mark Moller


DePaul University - College of Law


Texas Review of Law & Politics, Vol. 11, No. 39, 2007

Abstract:     
In this Article, I suggest that class action law can take some pointers on statutory interpretation from administrative law.

Trial courts often must decide whether they can "adapt" elements of statutory claims to "fit" the requirements for class litigation. (A judge might do so, for example, by adopting a statutory presumption of causation, in spite of evidence that the statute envisions individualized, case-by-case causation inquiries.)

Courts that "modify" statutes in this way often assume the statute they are applying "travels with" an implicit instruction that courts should adapt it, where necessary, to remedy wide-scale injuries. In effect, these courts assume substantive statutes presumptively delegate them special "dynamic interpretive" power in the class context.

No one has compared these assumptions to those that apply to interpretation by agencies. The comparison is revealing: If courts conformed to the interpretive norms of administrative law, they would not be so quick to assume Congress has "delegated" them special power to "adapt" statutes in the class context. Norms of interpretation in the class context, in other words, allow courts to take interpretive liberties that aren't permitted to agencies.

As a presumptive matter, this is backwards: Given their lack of a democratic pedigree, courts should be as restrained as agencies, if not more so. This Article therefore counsels a modest move in the direction of judicial restraint: Until Congress provides further guidance, courts should, at a minimum, consciously parallel the restraint they demand of agencies when deciding how much "license" they can take with a statute in the class context. This move, in turn, would reduce the number of class actions certified, while inviting more democratic oversight of class action litigation.

Keywords: Chevron, Administrative Law, Statutory Interpretation, Class Actions

JEL Classification: K00, K20, K40, K41

Accepted Paper Series





Not Available For Download

Date posted: June 14, 2006 ; Last revised: September 21, 2010

Suggested Citation

Moller, Mark, Class Action Lawmaking: An Administrative Law Model. Texas Review of Law & Politics, Vol. 11, No. 39, 2007. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=908710

Contact Information

Mark Moller (Contact Author)
DePaul University - College of Law ( email )
25 E. Jackson Blvd.
Chicago, IL Cook County 60604
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,138

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.313 seconds