Winter Count: Taking Stock of Abortion Rights after Casey and Carhart
Caitlin E. Borgmann
CUNY School of Law
Fordham Urban Law Journal, Vol. 31, p. 675, 2004
This Article examines Planned Parenthood v. Casey and Stenberg v. Carhart to assess the state of abortion rights today. A cursory look at Casey and Carhart might lead an observer to conclude that, although the Court has renounced key aspects of Roe's framework, the right to abortion remains well-protected under the Constitution. But such a conclusion would ignore the implications of the Court's decision in Casey and place too much hope in Carhart. Casey fundamentally changed the character of abortion rights in this country, reinventing it in a form more vulnerable to continued erosion. Carhart confirmed that extreme restrictions tantamount to a ban are unconstitutional under Casey, but short of this bottom line little of Roe's protections remain. While the right to abortion thus exists in theory, many women - particularly the most politically powerless - find the cumulative burdens impossible to overcome.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 42
Keywords: abortion, women, partial-birth abortion, partial birth, webster, casey, stenberg, carhart, roe v. wade, undue burden, health exception, D&X, intact D&E, abortion procedure
JEL Classification: I00, I10, I18, I19, J16, K30, K32, K39, K40, K49Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: July 12, 2006 ; Last revised: February 26, 2008
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.313 seconds