Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=908952
 
 

Citations (3)



 
 

Footnotes (413)



 


 



Instituting Innocence Reform: Wisconsin's New Governance Experiment


Katherine R. Kruse


Hamline University - School of Law


Wisconsin Law Review, p. 645, 2006
UNLV William S. Boyd School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 07-11

Abstract:     
The DNA exoneration cases of the past two decades have provided a window into what hasn't been working in the criminal justice system and an agenda for criminal justice reform. The challenge currently facing the innocence reform community is to translate this agenda into concrete reforms that institute and sustain best practices for the investigation and prosecution of crimes, while allowing flexibility for the understanding of best practices to continue to evolve. In 2005, Wisconsin underwent a breathtaking course of legal reform in two of the problem areas that have plagued wrongful convictions: mistaken eyewitness identification and false confession. The Wisconsin reforms in both areas allow - and in the area of eyewitness identification require - local agencies to adopt and periodically revisit the policies that govern their own practices in light of social scientific theory and in light of models developed in other jurisdictions.

Because of this institutional structure that delegates rule-making authority to local police agencies, Wisconsin's innocence reforms fit well within a new paradigm of regulatory jurisprudence called democratic experimentalism, which eschews top-down regulation in favor of allowing general norms to be articulated and informed from the bottom up through a combination of benchmarking best practices and encouraging local experimentation within a regime of public accountability based on measurable outcomes. This article explores the Wisconsin experience as a case study within this new regulatory framework. It concludes that although Wisconsin's innocence reforms are promising, they lack an adequate institutional structure to sustain continued reform. In particular, their reliance on enforcing the new regulatory structure through the exclusionary rule in individual criminal cases will be inadequate to meet the goals of continuous improvement. However, the prospect of invoking the elaborate accountability structures of experimentalism faces similar challenges. A careful analysis of the process of legislative reform in Wisconsin - and the national reform networks within which it occurred - demonstrates that incremental reform designed to gain genuine buy-in among diverse criminal justice stakeholders on a local level may ultimately be a more fruitful approach. Although more ambitious experimentalist accountability structures may be counterproductive in the context of regulating police investigations, the experimentalist focus on information-pooling and cross-jurisdictional learning may prove important in a more incremental and loosely-structured reform process.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 93

Keywords: new governance, eyewitness identification, due process, criminal procedure, innocence, false confession

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: June 19, 2006  

Suggested Citation

Kruse, Katherine R., Instituting Innocence Reform: Wisconsin's New Governance Experiment. Wisconsin Law Review, p. 645, 2006; UNLV William S. Boyd School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 07-11. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=908952

Contact Information

Kate Kruse (Contact Author)
Hamline University - School of Law ( email )
1536 Hewitt Avenue
Saint Paul, MN 55104-1237
United States
651-523-2472 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,051
Downloads: 94
Download Rank: 165,054
Citations:  3
Footnotes:  413

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.281 seconds