Presidential War Power: Do the Courts Offer Any Answers?

Geoffrey S. Corn

South Texas College of Law

Military Law Review, Vol. 157, No. 180, October 1998

This article surveys the history of federal jurisprudence related to war making decisions. In so doing, it seeks to refute the perception that such decisions are conclusively beyond the realm of judicial review as a result of the political question doctrine of judicial restraint. Instead, the survey of these decisions demonstrates that the more relevant doctrine is that of ripeness. Accordingly, the article asserts that in the appropriate circumstances, the courts could intervene in a war powers dispute between the two political branches. However, such intervention would only be possible in response to express congressional opposition to a presidential war making decision, and only then if the President were unable to offer a legitimate theory of defensive necessity.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 55

Keywords: President, War Powers

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: June 19, 2006  

Suggested Citation

Corn, Geoffrey S., Presidential War Power: Do the Courts Offer Any Answers?. Military Law Review, Vol. 157, No. 180, October 1998. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=909575

Contact Information

Geoffrey S. Corn (Contact Author)
South Texas College of Law ( email )
1303 San Jacinto Street
Houston, TX 77002
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 608
Downloads: 82
Download Rank: 224,544

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.172 seconds