|
||||
|
||||
Political Regimes, Business Cycles, Seasonalities, and Returns
John G. Powell Massey University - Department of Finance Banking and Property Jing Shi Australian National University - School of Finance and Applied Statistics Tom Smith Australian National University - Faculty of Economics & Commerce Robert E. Whaley Vanderbilt University - Owen Graduate School of Management December 17, 2008 Abstract: This paper provides a method for testing for regime differences when regimes are long-lasting. Standard testing procedures are generally inappropriate because regime persistence causes a spurious regression problem - a problem that has led to incorrect inference in a broad range of studies involving regimes representing political, business, and seasonal cycles. The paper outlines analytically how standard estimators can be adjusted for regime dummy variable persistence. While the adjustments are helpful asymptotically, spurious regression remains a problem in small samples and must be addressed using simulation or bootstrap procedures. We provide a simulation procedure for testing hypotheses in situations where an independent variable in a time-series regression is a persistent regime dummy variable. We also develop a procedure for testing hypotheses in situations where the dependent variable has similar properties.
Keywords: persistent regimes, regime difference tests, spurious regression, dummy variable JEL Classifications: G12, C15, C22 Working Paper SeriesDate posted: June 17, 2006 ; Last revised: December 22, 2008Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo4 in 0.109 seconds.