Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=909603
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (114)



 


 



Implicit Theories and Capital Sentencing: An Experimental Study


Jeremy A. Blumenthal


Syracuse University - College of Law

June 2006

1st Annual Conference on Empirical Legal Studies Paper

Abstract:     
Social psychological research shows that some individuals ("entity theorists") view others as possessing fixed, unchanging moral traits; some individuals ("incremental theorists") see others' moral traits as malleable and dynamic. Such individual differences in implicit theories reliably predicts people's levels of punitiveness, their endorsement of certain moral theories and punitive philosophies, their likelihood of stereotyping others, and other legally relevant judgments. Empirical legal research on such beliefs relevant to the law, however, is almost non-existent. Accordingly, in three experimental mock juror studies, I investigated the effect of respondents' implicit theory on their capital sentencing decisions. Primary results demonstrate that across samples, (1) incremental theorists are less likely to impose a death sentence; and (2) entity theorists are more willing to impose a death sentence when the defendant is African-American. Policy implications are discussed.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 33

Keywords: juror decision making, mock juror experiment, capital sentencing, law and psychology, implicit theories

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: June 19, 2006  

Suggested Citation

Blumenthal, Jeremy A., Implicit Theories and Capital Sentencing: An Experimental Study (June 2006). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=909603 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.909603

Contact Information

Jeremy A. Blumenthal (Contact Author)
Syracuse University - College of Law ( email )
Syracuse, NY 13244-1030
United States
315-443-2083 (Phone)
315-443-5394 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 778
Downloads: 99
Download Rank: 157,945
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  114

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.266 seconds