A Jurisprudence of Dysfunction: On the Role of 'Normal Species Functioning' in Disability Analysis
Ani B. Satz
Emory University School of Law; Rollins School of Public Health; Center for Ethics; Georgetown University Law Center
Yale Journal of Health Policy, Law, and Ethics, Vol. 6, p. 221, June 2006
Emory Public Law Research Paper No. 06-19
This article considers the proper role of normal species functioning in disability analysis. Failure to consider properly the role of normal functioning has profoundly impacted American disability law by creating divergent outcomes in the application of established United States Supreme Court tests and severely undermining protections for persons with disabilities. This article examines competing, dominant conceptual models of functioning, the Supreme Court's use of these models, and then proposes a novel conceptual framework, which requires a blend of the models as applied to three distinct levels of disability analysis. This article is a discrete and integral part of disability law reform, bearing on the tension between civil rights and social welfare models of disability law.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 48
Keywords: disability, discrimination, philosophy, ethics, civil rights, government policy, public policy, health law
JEL Classification: I12, I18, J71, K31, Z00
Date posted: June 23, 2006
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.219 seconds