Abstract

 
 

References (46)



 
 

Citations (31)



 


 



Can Budget Institutions Counteract Political Indiscipline?


S. Fabrizio


International Monetary Fund (IMF)

Ashoka Mody


International Monetary Fund (IMF) - Research Department

May 2006

IMF Working Paper No. 06/123

Abstract:     
The budget is an expression of political rather than economic priorities. We confirm this proposition for a group of new and potential members of the European Union, finding that politics dominates. The contemporary practice of democracy can increase budget deficits through not only ideological preferences but also more fragmented government coalitions and higher voter participation. Long-term structural forces, triggered by societal divisions and representative electoral rules, have more ambiguous implications but also appear to increase budget pressures, as others have also found. However, our most robust, and hopeful, finding is that budget institutions-mechanisms and rules of the budget process - that create checks and balances have significant value even when the politics is representative but undisciplined, and when long-term structural forces are unfavorable.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 53

Keywords: Fiscal policy, budget institutions, electoral rules, government fragmentation, government ideology, ethnic fractionalization, voter turnover

JEL Classification: D70, E60, H60

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: June 21, 2006  

Suggested Citation

Fabrizio, S. and Mody, Ashoka, Can Budget Institutions Counteract Political Indiscipline? (May 2006). IMF Working Paper, Vol. , pp. 1-53, 2006. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=910688

Contact Information

Stefania Fabrizio (Contact Author)
International Monetary Fund (IMF) ( email )
700 19th Street NW
Washington, DC 20431
United States
Ashoka Mody
International Monetary Fund (IMF) - Research Department ( email )
700 19th Street NW
Washington, DC 20431
United States
202-623-9617 (Phone)
202-589-9617 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://www.amody.com
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 533
Downloads: 103
Download Rank: 113,278
References:  46
Citations:  31

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.532 seconds