Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=911284
 
 

Citations (4)



 
 

Footnotes (132)



 


 



Between Rights and Contract: Arbitration Agreements and Non-Compete Covenants as a Hybrid Form of Employment Law


Cynthia L. Estlund


New York University School of Law

June 21, 2006

University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 155, 2006
NYU Law School, Public Law Research Paper No. 06-20
NYU, Law and Economics Research Paper No. 06-27

Abstract:     
The employment relationship is governed largely by contract, but with a heavy overlay of rights: minimum terms and individual rights that are established by external law and typically non-waivable. But some terms of employment are governed neither by ordinary contract nor by ordinary rights, nor even by ordinary waivable rights. Consider the two most controversial instruments in employment law today: non-compete covenants (NCCs) and mandatory arbitration agreements (MAAs). Both take the form of written contracts that waive important employee rights (the right to compete post-employment, the right to litigate future claims); both are subject to substantive criteria of validity that are set by external law. Both bodies of law may be usefully described as recognizing conditionally waivable rights.

This paper aims first to show structural parallels between NCCs and MAAs that place them at a distinct intermediate point along the spectrum between non-waivable rights and ordinary contract that I call conditional waivability. Second, it seeks to uncover a common logic underlying the law's choice of this particular hybrid of rights and contract. The linchpin of that common logic lies in the threat that unregulated waiver of one right (the right to compete or to litigate future claims) poses to an adjacent employee right that the law deems non-waivable. Third, the paper deploys that underlying logic to offer a critical assessment of the law governing NCCs and MAAs. Finally, the paper tentatively explores the broader potential usefulness of conditional waivability as a way of regulating some terms of employment. The intriguing potential of conditional waivability lies in its injection of some of the virtues of contract - especially flexibility and variability in the face of widely divergent and changing circumstances - into the pursuit of public goals and the realization of rights in the workplace.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 68

Keywords: employment, contract, covenant-not-to-compete, arbitration

JEL Classification: J38, J78, K12, K31

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: June 25, 2006 ; Last revised: January 10, 2014

Suggested Citation

Estlund, Cynthia L., Between Rights and Contract: Arbitration Agreements and Non-Compete Covenants as a Hybrid Form of Employment Law (June 21, 2006). University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 155, 2006; NYU Law School, Public Law Research Paper No. 06-20; NYU, Law and Economics Research Paper No. 06-27. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=911284 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.911284

Contact Information

Cynthia L. Estlund (Contact Author)
New York University School of Law ( email )
40 Washington Square South
New York, NY 10012-1099
United States
(212) 998-6184 (Phone)
(212) 995-4881 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,465
Downloads: 368
Download Rank: 42,778
Citations:  4
Footnotes:  132

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 1.391 seconds