Religious Purpose, Inerrancy, and the Establishment Clause
Daniel O. Conkle
Indiana University Maurer School of Law
Indiana Law Journal, Vol. 67, p. 1, 1991
Indiana Legal Studies Research Paper
According to the much-contested "purpose" requirement of the Supreme Court's Establishment Clause doctrine, laws must be grounded on secular as opposed to religious purposes. This article advances a normative argument concerning how this requirement should be construed. The author distinguishes between different types of religious purposes and different types of religious beliefs. Most importantly, he distinguishes between "inerrant" religious beliefs, which are characterized by a certain type of closed-mindedness, and "dialogic" religious beliefs, which are not. After developing a suggested analytical framework, the author applies his approach to the issues of school prayer, evolution, and abortion. He then confront various objections that might be made to his argument, including the claim that all religious beliefs must he treated alike.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 24
Keywords: Constitutional Law, Establishment Clause, Religion and Politics, Religious Liberty
JEL Classification: K00, K10, K19, K30, K39Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: June 26, 2006
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.406 seconds