The Fungibility of Damage Awards: Punitive Damage Caps and Substitution
University of Pennsylvania Law School; Erasmus School of Law; PERC - Property and Environment Research Center
Catherine M. Sharkey
New York University School of Law
February 23, 2007
FSU College of Law, Law and Economics Paper No. 912256
Columbia Law and Economics Working Paper No. 298
Conventional wisdom suggests that punitive damages are growing out of control. To stop juries from awarding blockbuster punitive damages, a number of states have passed caps to set a ceiling on the amount of punitives. In principle, if plaintiffs' attorneys and/or juries wish to circumvent such caps, they could simply increase the amount of compensatory damages awarded. To investigate this possibility, we examine data from the Civil Justice Surveys performed by the National Center for State Courts and present evidence in both difference-in-difference and triple differences frameworks that punitive damage caps are associated with an increase in compensatory damage awards. These results suggest that caps alone are a poor way to constrain damage awards.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 36
Keywords: Tort Reform, Blockbuster Awards, Punitive Damages, Punitives, Juries, Litigation
JEL Classification: K00, K13, K41working papers series
Date posted: June 27, 2006
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.500 seconds