Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=912296
 
 

Footnotes (84)



 


 



The Illegality of Resentencing


Quin M. Sorenson


Sidley Austin LLP


Duquesne University Law Review, Vol. 44, p. 211, 2006

Abstract:     
The Supreme Court in United States v. Booker held that mandatory application of the United States Sentencing Guidelines is inherently unconstitutional and, to preserve the federal sentencing structure, it excised several provisions of the United States Code that required district courts to adhere to the Guidelines in sentencing criminal defendants. Yet, the Court did not address one provision of the Code, 18 U.S.C. Section 3742(g)(2), that still requires district courts to adhere to the Guidelines in resentencing criminal defendants. This article explores this provision and concludes that it renders all resentencing in the federal system illegal, in violation of either the statute or the Constitution. District courts are called upon to recognize the unconstitutionality of 18 U.S.C. Section 3742(g)(2) sua sponte and to excise it from the United States Code.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 14

Keywords: sentencing, resentencing, booker, 3742(g)

JEL Classification: K14

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: July 3, 2006  

Suggested Citation

Sorenson, Quin M., The Illegality of Resentencing. Duquesne University Law Review, Vol. 44, p. 211, 2006. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=912296

Contact Information

Quin M. Sorenson (Contact Author)
Sidley Austin LLP
1501 K Street NW
Washington, DC 20005
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,178
Downloads: 79
Download Rank: 183,293
Footnotes:  84

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.250 seconds