Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=913005
 
 

Footnotes (63)



 


 



Murder After the Merger: A Commentary on Finkelstein


Kimberly Kessler Ferzan


University of Virginia, School of Law


Buffalo Criminal Law Review, Vol. 9, p. 561, 2006

Abstract:     
Critics have long sought the abolition of the felony murder rule, arguing that it is a form of strict liability. Despite widespread criticism, the rule remains firmly entrenched in many states' criminal statutes. In "Merger and Felony Murder," Professor Claire Finkelstein reconciles herself to the current state of affairs, and seeks to make "an incremental improvement" to the doctrine. She offers a new test for felony murder's merger limitation, which she believes will make merger less "mysterious" and its application "substantially clearer." Briefly put, Finkelstein claims that to understand merger, we must recognize that it is an analytically necessary part of felony murder that the defendant commit two acts - a felony and a killing. Thus, a killing merges with the felony when we have only one act instead of two. To make this determination, Finkelstein articulates a "redescriptive" test that tells us when the felony can be redescribed as a killing.

Despite this project's potential, I believe that Finkelstein's proposed merger test, far from improving our understanding of merger, further confuses the doctrine. Finkelstein starts from the false conceptual premise that felony murder requires both a felony and then a distinct act of killing. There is simply no support for this claim. Nor does the promise of this project bear out in the application of Finkelstein's test to actual cases. First, the test cannot be squared with two other limitations on felony murder liability. Second, Finkelstein's test is guilty of the very arbitrary application for which she criticizes other tests. Finally, Finkelstein unsettles the law by turning paradigmatic cases on their heads. Finkelstein's theory, while claiming to refine felony murder, ultimately abolishes the doctrine as we know it and replaces it with a doctrine that seems even more unacceptable.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 15

Keywords: criminal law, felony murder, merger

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: July 10, 2006  

Suggested Citation

Ferzan, Kimberly Kessler, Murder After the Merger: A Commentary on Finkelstein. Buffalo Criminal Law Review, Vol. 9, p. 561, 2006. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=913005

Contact Information

Kimberly Kessler Ferzan (Contact Author)
University of Virginia, School of Law ( email )
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,342
Downloads: 73
Download Rank: 193,211
Footnotes:  63

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.281 seconds