Abstract

 
 

Footnotes (31)



 


 



First Person Plural


James Ming Chen


University of Louisville - Louis D. Brandeis School of Law

July 9, 2006

Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 06-30

Abstract:     
Like most other Indo-European languages, English does not distinguish between the inclusive and exclusive uses of the first person plural. By contrast, languages as diverse as Tok Pisin, Samoan, Taiwanese, and Cherokee take care to distinguish between first person plural pronouns that include the listener and those that exclude the listener. This linguistic difference sheds light on the use of we throughout the foundational documents and the authoritative interpretations of the American constitutional tradition.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 8

Keywords: linguistics, constitutional law, Constitution, Declaration of Independence, Supreme Court, pronouns

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: July 11, 2006 ; Last revised: March 11, 2008

Suggested Citation

Chen, James Ming, First Person Plural (July 9, 2006). Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 06-30. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=916018 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.916018

Contact Information

James Ming Chen (Contact Author)
University of Louisville - Louis D. Brandeis School of Law ( email )
Wilson W. Wyatt Hall
Louisville, KY 40292
United States
502-852-3263 (Phone)
502-852-0862 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://www.law.louisville.edu/faculty/jim_chen
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 3,745
Downloads: 403
Download Rank: 33,710
Footnotes:  31

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.532 seconds