Abstract

 


 



What have we learned from a decade of empirical research on growth? Comment on `It`s Not Factor Accumulation: Stylized Facts and Growth Models,` by William Easterly and Ross Levine


Paul M. Romer


Stanford Graduate School of Business; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)

August 2001

World Bank Economic Review, Vol. 15, Issue 2, pp. 225-227, 2001

Abstract:     
When economists in the 1950s and 1960s used growth models to understand the experience of developing countries, they allowed for the possibility of technology differences between developing countries and the United States. But because they did not have a good theory for talking about the forces that determined the level of the technology-in the United States any more than in developing countries-technology factors tended to be pushed into the background in policy discussions.

Accepted Paper Series


Date posted: February 29, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Romer, Paul M., What have we learned from a decade of empirical research on growth? Comment on `It`s Not Factor Accumulation: Stylized Facts and Growth Models,` by William Easterly and Ross Levine (August 2001). World Bank Economic Review, Vol. 15, Issue 2, pp. 225-227, 2001. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=916800

Contact Information

Paul M. Romer (Contact Author)
Stanford Graduate School of Business ( email )
L235 Littlefield
Stanford, CA 94305-5015
United States
650-723-3025 (Phone)
650-725-9932 (Fax)

National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)
1050 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 247

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.859 seconds