|
||||
|
||||
Law and Economics of Plea-Bargaining
Nuno Garoupa University of Illinois College of Law Frank Stephen University of Manchester - School of Law July 2006 Abstract: Although highly criticized by legal scholars, plea-bargaining is probably the most transplanted instrument of criminal procedure. In contrast to most of the legal literature, Law and Economics is quite optimistic about it. In this paper, we take the view that such optimism is not well founded. Our approach is based on the view of plea-bargaining as part of a nexus of relationships that undermines the efficiency argument. In particular, we find it quite important to assess the defendant's lawyer's incentives and the prosecutor's goals, both of which are rather neglected in Law and Economics. Other aspects we consider are the interests of the victims and judicial scrutiny. Our conclusions temper the usual Law and Economics optimism.
Keywords: Plea-Bargaining, Defendant, Prosecution, Judicial Scrutiny JEL Classifications: K4 Working Paper SeriesDate posted: July 21, 2006 ; Last revised: July 21, 2006Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
© 2010 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was served by apollo6a in 0.250 seconds.