Mark A. Lemley
Stanford Law School
Minnesota Law Review, Vol. 91, 2006
We have faced a situation like this before, decades ago. As business-to-business commerce became more common in the middle of the 20th Century, companies began putting standard contract terms on the back of their purchase orders and shipment invoices. When each side to a contract used such a form, courts had to confront the question of whose form controlled. After unsuccessful judicial experimentation with a variety of rules, the Uniform Commercial Code resolved this battle of the forms by adopting a compromise under which if the terms conflicted, neither party's terms became part of the contract unless the party demonstrated its willingness to forego the deal over it. Rather, the default rules of contract law applied where the parties' standard forms disagreed, but where neither party in fact insisted on those terms.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 25Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: July 19, 2006
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.422 seconds