Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=918061
 
 

Footnotes (159)



 


 



Congress Clears Its Throat


Edward A. Hartnett


Seton Hall University School of Law


Constitutional Commentary, Vol. 22, p. 553, 2005

Abstract:     
In the welter of opinions issued in connection with the Schiavo case, one opinion attracted enormous attention: the opinion by Judge Birch finding unconstitutional the Act of Congress providing for federal jurisdiction. That opinion was quite wrong in many ways, ranging from its failure to support Judge Birch's vote on the question before the Court to its treatment of statutory and common law principles as if they were constitutional requirements. Moreover, its interpretation of Klein v. United States, 80 U.S. 128 (1871) - a case involving the appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, sovereign immunity, and a Presidential pardon in the wake of the Civil War - demonstrates the enduring wisdom of Professor Young's observation that Klein has given rise to a devotion among judges and scholars resembling a cult.

This article defends that Act of Congress against Judge Birch's criticism. It also places Klein in the context of the general constitutional law principle of vested rights. This context not only reveals that the pardon is relevant in Klein both as an independent ground of decision and as one means of creating vested rights, it also provides insight into the sovereign immunity problem.

Judge Birch's opinion nevertheless serves to bring into focus significant concerns about officials in Washington determining that a particular state court case was important, singling it out from the thousands of decided cases, providing for its adjudication in a federal court unburdened by the preclusive effect of the state court judgment, and insisting that their decision to single out this case not be understood as establishing a precedent. However, those who find themselves appalled by the Act should ask themselves why they are so unconcerned when the Supreme Court does the same thing.

Perhaps Congress was simply trying to do something about a particular tragedy that stuck in its craw, or perhaps it was sending a message to federal courts. But perhaps Congress was beginning to find its voice to assert control over the jurisdiction of federal courts.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 32

Keywords: Schiavo, Klein, federal jurisdiction, judicial activism, en banc, Rooker-Feldman, standard of review, rule of decision, special legislation, private laws

JEL Classification: K40

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: July 21, 2006  

Suggested Citation

Hartnett, Edward A., Congress Clears Its Throat. Constitutional Commentary, Vol. 22, p. 553, 2005. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=918061

Contact Information

Edward A. Hartnett (Contact Author)
Seton Hall University School of Law ( email )
One Newark Center
Newark, NJ 07102-5210
United States
973-642-8842 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 451
Downloads: 51
Download Rank: 221,375
Footnotes:  159

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.547 seconds