SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 
 

Citations (1)

Beta

 
 

Footnotes (50)

Beta

 


 


Download | Share | Email | Add to Briefcase | Buy Hard Copy

Ex Ante Choices of Law and Forum: An Empirical Analysis of Corporate Merger Agreements

Theodore Eisenberg
Cornell University - School of Law

Geoffrey P. Miller
New York University - School of Law


July 20, 2006

NYU, Law and Economics Research Paper No. 06-31

Abstract:     
Legal scholars devote much attention to the incorporation puzzle - why corporations so frequently incorporate in Delaware. This paper suggests that focusing on the incorporation decision overlooks a broader but intimately related set of questions. Choosing Delaware as the incorporation situs is, effectively, a choice-of-law decision. Incorporating in Delaware selects Delaware law for (and authorizes Delaware courts to adjudicate) legal disputes about the allocation of a firm's governance authority. In this sense, the incorporation decision is similar to any setting in which a company selects a law or authorizes a dispute resolution forum. We study a data set of 412 merger and acquisition contracts contained as exhibits in SEC Form 8-K filings over a seven month period in 2002 to assess the decisions the parties have made regarding choice-of-law and choice-of-forum. Although these contracts frequently select Delaware law and Delaware as a forum, there is a relative "flight" from Delaware in this contractual setting. Delaware corporations choose Delaware law less than other corporations choose the law of their state of incorporation. Furthermore, many contracts specifying Delaware law did not specify Delaware as the litigation forum. Contracts designating Delaware law tend to choose Delaware as a litigation forum less than contracts that designate other states' laws tend to choose such states as a litigation forum. Delaware was the place of incorporation for 189 merger contracts; it was the choice of law for 132. With respect to forum selection, 115 contracts that designated a forum had Delaware corporate acquirers. Yet only 64 contracts specified Delaware as the litigation forum. In contrast, for example, New York had eight corporate acquirers and 45 contracts specifying that New York law governed. We investigate the determinants underlying these decisions about choice-of-law and forum selection. Regression results confirm the flight from Delaware law and forum.

Keywords: Choice-of-law, Delaware, Choice-of-forum, corporate governance

JEL Classifications: K00, K12, K20, K22

Working Paper Series

Date posted: July 27, 2006 ; Last revised: March 17, 2008

Suggested Citation

Eisenberg, Theodore and Miller, Geoffrey P., Ex Ante Choices of Law and Forum: An Empirical Analysis of Corporate Merger Agreements (July 20, 2006). NYU, Law and Economics Research Paper No. 06-31. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=918735


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

Theodore Eisenberg (Contact Author)
Cornell University - School of Law ( email )
Myron Taylor Hall
Ithaca, NY 14853
United States
607-255-6477 (Phone)
607-255-7193 (Fax)
Geoffrey P. Miller
New York University - School of Law ( email )
Center for the Study of Central Banks
40 Washington Square South
New York, NY 10012-1099
United States
212-998-6329 (Phone)
212-995-4590 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,736
Downloads: 320
Download Rank: 25,333
Citations: 1
Footnotes: 50

© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use  Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo3 in 0.109 seconds.