Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=918823
 


 



Improving the Judicial Review of Common-Law Argumentation


Ryan Patrick Alford


Bora Laskin Faculty of Law, Lakehead University


IMPROVING THE JUDICIAL REVIEW OF COMMON-LAW ARGUMENTATION, Frans H. van Eemeren, ed., Newport News, VA: Vale Press, 2002

Abstract:     
American scholars of legal rhetoric have taken a position on the disconnectedness between normative legal theory and legal practice, particularly the practice of forensic oratory, which must be addressed before pragma-dialectical argumentation theorists can move forward to concrete and constructive engagement with American legal theorists. This engagement could provide benefits and insights to both parties, espcially because of the structural similarity between the prescriptive dimension of dialectical argumentation theory and the procedural norms of the common law. In particular, pragma-dialectical argumentation theory might prove helpful to jurists seeking a more effective approach to the 'harmless error analysis' of courtroom argumentation.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 17

Keywords: rhetoric, stanley fish, james boyd white, argumentation theory, harmless error analysis, forensic oratory, closing arguments, summations, appellate review, pragma-dialectics, critical legal studies, Aristotle, van Eemeren

JEL Classification: K14

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: September 17, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Alford, Ryan Patrick, Improving the Judicial Review of Common-Law Argumentation. IMPROVING THE JUDICIAL REVIEW OF COMMON-LAW ARGUMENTATION, Frans H. van Eemeren, ed., Newport News, VA: Vale Press, 2002. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=918823

Contact Information

Ryan Patrick Alford (Contact Author)
Bora Laskin Faculty of Law, Lakehead University ( email )
955 Oliver Road
Thunder Bay, ON P7B 5E1
Canada
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 673
Downloads: 86
Download Rank: 179,947

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.328 seconds