SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 


 



The Futile Quest for Racial Neutrality in Capital Selection and the Eighth Amendment Argument for Abolition Based on Unconscious Racial Discrimination

Scott Howe
Chapman University - School of Law



William & Mary Law Review, Vol. 45, p. 2083, 2004

Abstract:     
This article begins by discussing the characteristics of current capital-sentencing systems that make racial discrimination in capital selection uncontrollable. It also summarizes the social-science evidence that white-victim bias widely plagues capital selection. The article then develops the two central arguments suggested by its title. First, it provides a detailed explanation of why proposals for federal regulatory reform cannot succeed in achieving racial neutrality in capital selection. Second, it provides a theory to explain why unconscious racial discrimination in capital selection violates the Eighth Amendment and, given the futility of federal regulatory remedies, justifies abolition.

Keywords: Capital punishment, capital sentencing, death penalty

Accepted Paper Series

Date posted: July 27, 2006 ; Last revised: July 27, 2006

Suggested Citation

Howe, Scott, The Futile Quest for Racial Neutrality in Capital Selection and the Eighth Amendment Argument for Abolition Based on Unconscious Racial Discrimination. William & Mary Law Review, Vol. 45, p. 2083, 2004. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=920516


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

Scott Howe (Contact Author)
Chapman University - School of Law ( email )
One University Drive
Orange, CA 92866-1099
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 165
Downloads: 26

© 2010 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was served by apollo5b in 0.281 seconds.