|
||||
|
||||
The Futile Quest for Racial Neutrality in Capital Selection and the Eighth Amendment Argument for Abolition Based on Unconscious Racial Discrimination
Scott Howe Chapman University - School of Law William & Mary Law Review, Vol. 45, p. 2083, 2004 Abstract: This article begins by discussing the characteristics of current capital-sentencing systems that make racial discrimination in capital selection uncontrollable. It also summarizes the social-science evidence that white-victim bias widely plagues capital selection. The article then develops the two central arguments suggested by its title. First, it provides a detailed explanation of why proposals for federal regulatory reform cannot succeed in achieving racial neutrality in capital selection. Second, it provides a theory to explain why unconscious racial discrimination in capital selection violates the Eighth Amendment and, given the futility of federal regulatory remedies, justifies abolition.
Keywords: Capital punishment, capital sentencing, death penalty Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: July 27, 2006 ; Last revised: July 27, 2006Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||
© 2010 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was served by apollo5b in 0.281 seconds.