SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 
 

References (25)

Beta

 
 

Citations (7)

Beta

 


 


Download | Share | Email | Add to Briefcase | Buy Hard Copy

Spam Works: Evidence from Stock Touts and Corresponding Market Activity

Laura Frieder
Purdue University - Krannert School of Management

Jonathan Zittrain
Harvard Law School


March 14, 2007

Berkman Center Research Publication No. 2006-11
Harvard Public Law Working Paper No. 135
Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper No. 43/2006

Abstract:     
We assess the impact of spam that touts stocks upon the trading activity of those stocks and sketch how profitable such spamming might be for spammers and how harmful it is to those who heed advice in stock-touting e-mails. We find convincing evidence that stock prices are being manipulated through spam. We suggest that the effectiveness of spammed stock touting calls into question prevailing models of securities regulation that rely principally on the proper labeling of information and disclosure of conflicts of interest as means of protecting consumers, and we propose several regulatory and industry interventions.

Based on a large sample of touted stocks listed on the Pink Sheets quotation system and a large sample of spam emails touting stocks, we find that stocks experience a significantly positive return on days prior to heavy touting via spam. Volume of trading
responds positively and significantly to heavy touting. For a stock that is touted at some point during our sample period, the probability of it being the most actively traded stock in our sample jumps from 4% on a day when there is no touting activity to 70% on a day when there is touting activity. Returns in the days following touting are significantly negative. The evidence accords with a hypothesis that spammers "buy low and spam high," purchasing penny stocks with comparatively low liquidity, then touting them - perhaps immediately after an independently occurring upward tick in price, or after having caused the uptick themselves by engaging in preparatory purchasing - in order to increase or maintain trading activity and price enough to unload their positions at a profit. We find that prolific spamming greatly affects the trading volume of a targeted stock, drumming up buyers to prevent the spammer's initial selling from depressing the stock's price. Subsequent selling by the spammer (or others) while this buying pressure subsides results in negative returns following touting. Before brokerage fees, the average investor who buys a stock on the day it is most heavily touted and sells it 2 days after the touting ends will lose close to 5.5%. For those touted stocks with above-average levels of touting, a spammer who buys on the day before unleashing touts and sells on the day his or her touting is the heaviest, on average, will earn 4.29% before transaction costs. The underlying data and interactive charts showing price and volume changes are also made available.

Keywords: spam, stock, tout, markets, e-mail, Internet, cyberlaw, SEC, unsolicited, commercial, manipulation, timing, consumer protection, pink sheets, efficiency

JEL Classifications: C80, C81, D18, D52, D8, G1, G12, G14, G18, G28, L1

Working Paper Series

Date posted: July 27, 2006 ; Last revised: May 10, 2007

Suggested Citation

Frieder, Laura and Zittrain, Jonathan, Spam Works: Evidence from Stock Touts and Corresponding Market Activity (March 14, 2007). Berkman Center Research Publication No. 2006-11; Harvard Public Law Working Paper No. 135; Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper No. 43/2006. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=920553


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

Jonathan Zittrain (Contact Author)
Harvard Law School ( email )
Berkman Center for Internet & Society
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States
617-495-4643 (Phone)
617-495-7641 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://www.jz.org
Laura Frieder
Purdue University - Krannert School of Management ( email )
1310 Krannert Building
West Lafayette, IN 47907-1310
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 38,524
Downloads: 4,263
Download Rank: 341
References: 25
Citations: 7

© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use  Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo2 in 0.109 seconds.