Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=920878
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (254)



 


 



Using Statutes to Set Legislative Rules: Entrenchment, Separation of Powers, and the Rules of Proceedings Clause


Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl


University of Houston Law Center


Journal of Law & Politics, Vol. 19, 2003

Abstract:     
Each house of Congress ordinarily governs its proceedings through its own standing rules or through informal means such as consent. But sometimes Congress passes a statute that purports to regulate its parliamentary procedures. Indeed, such statutes have become increasingly prevalent in recent decades. The most famous of these regimes of "statutized rules" is probably the fast track procedure governing congressional consideration of trade agreements, but there are dozens of other examples spread throughout the US Code.

These proliferating statutes raise a number of interesting questions that have been little explored in the literature. Why would Congress use a statute instead of a rule? Is Congress legally required to follow these statutes, and does it typically follow them in fact? If statutized rules are unconstitutional, why? This article explores and offers preliminary answers to those questions. It concludes that such statutes can be either binding or constitutional, but not both.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 66

Keywords: rules of proceedings, fast track, framework legislation, congressional procedure, entrenchment, separation of powers

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: August 3, 2006  

Suggested Citation

Bruhl, Aaron-Andrew P., Using Statutes to Set Legislative Rules: Entrenchment, Separation of Powers, and the Rules of Proceedings Clause. Journal of Law & Politics, Vol. 19, 2003. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=920878

Contact Information

Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl (Contact Author)
University of Houston Law Center ( email )
100 Law Center
Suite 230 BLB
Houston, TX 77204-6054
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,033
Downloads: 117
Download Rank: 144,039
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  254

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.313 seconds