SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 
 

References (25)

Beta

 
 

Citations (3)

Beta

 


 


Download | Share | Email | Add to Briefcase | Buy Hard Copy

Yesterday's Expectation of Tomorrow Determines What You Do Today: The Role of Reference-Dependent Utility from Expectations

Astrid Matthey
Max Planck Society for the Advancement of the Sciences - Max Planck Institute for Economics


January 15, 2008

Jena Economic Research Paper No. 2008-003

Abstract:     
The paper introduces the concept of adjustment utility, that is, reference-dependent utility from expectations. It offers an explanation for observed preferences that cannot be explained with existing models, and yields new predictions for individual decision making. The model gives a simple explanation for, e.g., why people are reluctant to change their plans even when these turn out to be unexpectedly costly; people's aversion towards positive but false information, which cannot be explained with previous models; and the increasing acceptance of risks when people get used to them.

Keywords: utility, expectations, reference-dependent preferences, anticipation, prospect theory, experiments

JEL Classifications: D11, D81, D84, C99

Working Paper Series

Date posted: August 03, 2006 ; Last revised: March 02, 2008

Suggested Citation

Matthey, Astrid, Yesterday's Expectation of Tomorrow Determines What You Do Today: The Role of Reference-Dependent Utility from Expectations (January 15, 2008). Jena Economic Research Paper No. 2008-003. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=920997


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

Astrid Matthey (Contact Author)
Max Planck Society for the Advancement of the Sciences - Max Planck Institute for Economics ( email )
Kahlaische Strasse 10
D-07745 Jena Germany
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 320
Downloads: 85
Download Rank: 88,396
References: 25
Citations: 3
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use  Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo1 in 0.125 seconds.