|
||||
|
||||
Vioxx's History and the Need for Better Procedures and Better TestingMargaret GilhooleySeton Hall University - School of Law Seton Hall Law Review, Vol. 37, p. 941, 2007 Seton Hall Public Law Research Paper No. 921366 Abstract: When Vioxx was removed from the market because of risks found after approval, issues arose about the adequacy of FDA's authority and procedures to require warnings and testing for approved drugs. This paper examinies the regulatory and legislative history about the debate and the changes adopted by Congress in 2007 to strenthen FDA's authority. The agency has now been given authority to impose civil money penalties when needed changes are not made, but before this authority can be used the agency has to establish dispute resolution procedures about the changes needed. The article, published in 37 Seton Hall L. Rev. 941 (2007) considers the factors that bear on the type of dispute procedures that should be considered. The article also examines the value of encouraging better initial testing and comparative efficacy testing for drugs and the means to encourage that testing.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 28 Keywords: drug legislaton, drug safety, Vioxx, FDA, Food and Drug Administration, drug testing Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: August 1, 2006 ; Last revised: May 12, 2008Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo4 in 1.344 seconds