|
||||
|
||||
Presidential Signing Statements and Executive Power
Curtis A. Bradley Duke University - School of Law Eric A. Posner University of Chicago - Law School July 2006 U of Chicago, Public Law Working Paper No. 133 Duke Law School Legal Studies Paper No. 121 Abstract: A recent debate about the Bush administration's use of presidential signing statements has raised questions about their function, legality, and value. We argue that presidential signing statements are legal and that they provide a useful way for the president to disclose his views about the meaning and constitutionality of legislation. Although President Bush has challenged more statutory provisions in signing statements than prior administrations have, his signing statements are similar in many respects to the signing statements issued by prior presidents, such as President Clinton. In addition, basic tenets of positive political theory suggest that signing statements do not undermine the separation of powers or the legislative process and that, under certain circumstances, they can provide relevant evidence of statutory meaning. Working Paper Series Date posted: August 07, 2006 ; Last revised: March 19, 2009Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo2 in 0.156 seconds.