Abstract

 
 

Footnotes (29)



 


 



Lower Courts Untangle the Finer Points of SWANCC


Robin Kundis Craig


University of Utah S.J. Quinney College of Law


National Wetlands Newsletter, Vol. 24, No. 5, pp. 7-13, September-October 2002

Abstract:     
On January 2, 2001, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, holding that the Corps could not require SWANCC to get a Clean Water Act section 404 permit before filling ponds in an abandoned sand and gravel pit. In so holding, the Supreme Court redefined federal jurisdiction over wetlands, although the federal courts are still working out the scope of that redefinition.

This article explores lower courts' reactions to and interpretations of the SWANCC decision. It concludes that the lower courts have created a variety of approaches to assessing the Army Corps' authority to regulate wetlands, but that the emergining majority rule is that federal jurisdiction exists any time a wetland has a surface water connection -- however distant and convoluted -- to other "navigable waters."

Number of Pages in PDF File: 4

Keywords: Solid Waste Agency, SWANCC, wetlands, Army Corps, Clean Water Act, jurisdiction, majority rule, minority rule

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: August 7, 2006  

Suggested Citation

Craig, Robin Kundis, Lower Courts Untangle the Finer Points of SWANCC. National Wetlands Newsletter, Vol. 24, No. 5, pp. 7-13, September-October 2002. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=922506

Contact Information

Robin Kundis Craig (Contact Author)
University of Utah S.J. Quinney College of Law ( email )
332 S. 1400 East Front
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
United States

Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 514
Downloads: 41
Footnotes:  29

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.344 seconds