Lower Courts Untangle the Finer Points of SWANCC
Robin Kundis Craig
University of Utah S.J. Quinney College of Law
National Wetlands Newsletter, Vol. 24, No. 5, pp. 7-13, September-October 2002
On January 2, 2001, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, holding that the Corps could not require SWANCC to get a Clean Water Act section 404 permit before filling ponds in an abandoned sand and gravel pit. In so holding, the Supreme Court redefined federal jurisdiction over wetlands, although the federal courts are still working out the scope of that redefinition.
This article explores lower courts' reactions to and interpretations of the SWANCC decision. It concludes that the lower courts have created a variety of approaches to assessing the Army Corps' authority to regulate wetlands, but that the emergining majority rule is that federal jurisdiction exists any time a wetland has a surface water connection -- however distant and convoluted -- to other "navigable waters."
Number of Pages in PDF File: 4
Keywords: Solid Waste Agency, SWANCC, wetlands, Army Corps, Clean Water Act, jurisdiction, majority rule, minority ruleAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: August 7, 2006
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.282 seconds