Footnotes (173)



Are We Buyers or Hosts? A Memetic Approach to the First Amendment

Jeffrey Evans Stake

Indiana University Maurer School of Law

Alabama Law Review, Vol. 52, p. 1213, 2001

The First Amendment is often analyzed using the metaphor of the marketplace of ideas. Making use of memetic analysis, this article suggests that ideas should not be treated as inert products that we choose but as living things that sometimes exert some influence over their environment. Some of the ideas are more adept at surviving than others, and the ones that survive will not necessarily be good for humans. To account for the ability of some memes to replicate dangerously, the First Amendment should be read to allow governments to punish a speaker who advocates or threatens physical injury (other than punishment by the state) to the person or possessions of those who promote, oppose, or fail to espouse a certain idea. In other words, the constitution should allow us to be somewhat more intolerant of intolerance.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 56

Keywords: First Amendment, memes, memetic replication, marketplace of ideas, constitution, Brandenburg

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: August 8, 2006  

Suggested Citation

Stake, Jeffrey Evans, Are We Buyers or Hosts? A Memetic Approach to the First Amendment. Alabama Law Review, Vol. 52, p. 1213, 2001. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=922749

Contact Information

Jeffrey Evans Stake (Contact Author)
Indiana University Maurer School of Law ( email )
211 S. Indiana Avenue
Bloomington, IN 47405
United States
812-855-4444 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 994
Downloads: 55
Download Rank: 283,006
Footnotes:  173

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.203 seconds